<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chess Traps #3: King&#8217;s Gambit Declined Trap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap</link>
	<description>Great Board Games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: testofhp</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap/comment-page-1#comment-3472</link>
		<dc:creator>testofhp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap#comment-3472</guid>
		<description>@kamakis22 in my opinion the best reply to 
1.e4 is 1..c5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kamakis22 in my opinion the best reply to<br />
1.e4 is 1..c5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gamegenius4</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap/comment-page-1#comment-3473</link>
		<dc:creator>gamegenius4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap#comment-3473</guid>
		<description>didn&#039;t see that sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>didn&#8217;t see that sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kwanhui1990</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap/comment-page-1#comment-3474</link>
		<dc:creator>kwanhui1990</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap#comment-3474</guid>
		<description>yeah white pawn will get black bishop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah white pawn will get black bishop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamakis22</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap/comment-page-1#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>kamakis22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>In my opinion it is very unstable opening and though white loses both possitionally and materially he can maintain a good game.but i think that after
1.E4 the best answer is 1...E6 the french defense which is a solid opening.....
king&#039;s gambit is not very played
nowdays...or migt the sicilian defence...
i would probably take the pawn though
in king&#039;s gambit....any ideas about a stable opening in blitz games ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion it is very unstable opening and though white loses both possitionally and materially he can maintain a good game.but i think that after<br />
1.E4 the best answer is 1&#8230;E6 the french defense which is a solid opening&#8230;..<br />
king&#8217;s gambit is not very played<br />
nowdays&#8230;or migt the sicilian defence&#8230;<br />
i would probably take the pawn though<br />
in king&#8217;s gambit&#8230;.any ideas about a stable opening in blitz games ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrobichess</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap/comment-page-1#comment-3476</link>
		<dc:creator>jrobichess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap#comment-3476</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget the bishop being attacked by the pawn. It&#039;s about a pawn worth of material better for black﻿ if it just takes the queen first in that position. Thanks for checking out the vid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget the bishop being attacked by the pawn. It&#8217;s about a pawn worth of material better for black﻿ if it just takes the queen first in that position. Thanks for checking out the vid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gamegenius4</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap/comment-page-1#comment-3477</link>
		<dc:creator>gamegenius4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap#comment-3477</guid>
		<description>@ 4:45 isn&#039;t Bxf3!  better ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 4:45 isn&#8217;t Bxf3!  better ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gamegenius4</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap/comment-page-1#comment-3478</link>
		<dc:creator>gamegenius4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap#comment-3478</guid>
		<description>@melboy1233 first of all it&#039;s called a pawn not a poon.. secondly that is a legal move called en passant. Look it up if you want. It is basically when a double pawn move is made and an opposing pawn is adjacent to it,it can take the pawn and go one square ahead of the taken pawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@melboy1233 first of all it&#8217;s called a pawn not a poon.. secondly that is a legal move called en passant. Look it up if you want. It is basically when a double pawn move is made and an opposing pawn is adjacent to it,it can take the pawn and go one square ahead of the taken pawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ledgeleaper</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap/comment-page-1#comment-3479</link>
		<dc:creator>ledgeleaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap#comment-3479</guid>
		<description>rybka</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rybka</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melboy1233</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap/comment-page-1#comment-3480</link>
		<dc:creator>melboy1233</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap#comment-3480</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t understand this situation 4:05-4:10.. notice the white poon captures black poon..?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t understand this situation 4:05-4:10.. notice the white poon captures black poon..?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CroTomba</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap/comment-page-1#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>CroTomba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesaid.net/index.php/archives/chess-traps-3-kings-gambit-declined-trap#comment-3481</guid>
		<description>what program are you using</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what program are you using</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

